Fantasy Forecaster: Jan. 14-20
By Neil Tardy | Special to ESPN.com
If there's a topic I can discuss with some authority, it's how impatience can cost fantasy owners.
I hate to wait. And I hate seeing my players have bad games while fantasy free agents are lighting up my computer screen with stats. I mean, I know Earl Clark isn't the answer, but he had 22 points and 13 boards for the Los Angeles Lakers the other night, and I should have those stats.
In October, I was a big-time booster of Ersan Ilyasova. Of course, he was purged from my rosters by Thanksgiving. Even though Illy finally seems to have righted himself -- after struggling while trying to justify his big contract, losing his starting spot and getting it back and after the Milwaukee Bucks got a new coach -- I don't regret giving up on him. I have a roster to micromanage. No way was I waiting around through all of that.
Impatient as I am, whenever I check the ESPN.com Most Added/Dropped page, I realize I'm not the only one. Seriously, some of you folks are rash. Let's consider Matt Barnes. I guess I should go ahead and make Barnes the Forecaster's official favorite player, because this is the fourth time I've mentioned him in the past month. Initially I said "add Barnes" because the Los Angeles Clippers have an awesome schedule. Three weeks ago, I said "roll with Barnes" because the Clippers have another awesome schedule. Then two weeks ago, I said "stick with Barnes" but don't make him out to be a mainstream fantasy option because he plays only about 25 minutes a night. To make me look good, I guess, Barnes then scored in single digits in four of his next five games. Since then, Barnes' ownership has slipped from the 70 percent range to its current rate of 52.8 percent.
Two things here: 1) fleece those impatient owners and buy back on Barnes if he's available in your league; and 2) if you're deciding whether to keep a player, it's worth consulting the schedule. Because if you look ahead a little bit, you'll see that for the next week, and especially the week after, Barnes is a great investment. More on that in a bit.
[h=3]Week 12 at a Glance[/h]
<style type="text/css">.mod-inline td img {margin: 0px;}</style>
<thead>
</thead><tbody>
</tbody>"R" matchup ratings are based on a scale from 1 (poor matchup) to 10 (excellent matchup) and are calculated using a formula that evaluates the team's year-to-date and past 10 games' statistics, their opponents' numbers in those categories and their performance in home/road games depending on where the game is to be played. The column to the right lists the team's total number of games scheduled ("G") and home games ("H") and lists the overall rating from 1 to 10 for that team's weekly schedule ("R").
By Neil Tardy | Special to ESPN.com
If there's a topic I can discuss with some authority, it's how impatience can cost fantasy owners.
I hate to wait. And I hate seeing my players have bad games while fantasy free agents are lighting up my computer screen with stats. I mean, I know Earl Clark isn't the answer, but he had 22 points and 13 boards for the Los Angeles Lakers the other night, and I should have those stats.
In October, I was a big-time booster of Ersan Ilyasova. Of course, he was purged from my rosters by Thanksgiving. Even though Illy finally seems to have righted himself -- after struggling while trying to justify his big contract, losing his starting spot and getting it back and after the Milwaukee Bucks got a new coach -- I don't regret giving up on him. I have a roster to micromanage. No way was I waiting around through all of that.
Impatient as I am, whenever I check the ESPN.com Most Added/Dropped page, I realize I'm not the only one. Seriously, some of you folks are rash. Let's consider Matt Barnes. I guess I should go ahead and make Barnes the Forecaster's official favorite player, because this is the fourth time I've mentioned him in the past month. Initially I said "add Barnes" because the Los Angeles Clippers have an awesome schedule. Three weeks ago, I said "roll with Barnes" because the Clippers have another awesome schedule. Then two weeks ago, I said "stick with Barnes" but don't make him out to be a mainstream fantasy option because he plays only about 25 minutes a night. To make me look good, I guess, Barnes then scored in single digits in four of his next five games. Since then, Barnes' ownership has slipped from the 70 percent range to its current rate of 52.8 percent.
Two things here: 1) fleece those impatient owners and buy back on Barnes if he's available in your league; and 2) if you're deciding whether to keep a player, it's worth consulting the schedule. Because if you look ahead a little bit, you'll see that for the next week, and especially the week after, Barnes is a great investment. More on that in a bit.
[h=3]Week 12 at a Glance[/h]
<style type="text/css">.mod-inline td img {margin: 0px;}</style>
<center> </center> | Team | <center> Mon 1/14 </center> | <center> Tue 1/15 </center> | <center> Wed 1/16 </center> | <center> Thu 1/17 </center> | <center> Fri 1/18 </center> | <center> Sat 1/19 </center> | <center> Sun 1/20 </center> | <center> </center> |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta HAWKS | @CHI R: 3 | OFF | BKN R: 5 | OFF | @BKN R: 3 | SA R: 6 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Boston CELTICS | CHA R: 7 | OFF | NO R: 4 | OFF | CHI R: 2 | OFF | @DET R: 2 | G: 4 H: 3 R: 6 |
| Brooklyn NETS | OFF | TOR R: 6 | @ATL R: 5 | OFF | ATL R: 7 | OFF | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 5 |
| Charlotte BOBCATS | @BOS R: 4 | IND R: 1 | OFF | OFF | @ORL R: 4 | SAC R: 7 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Chicago BULLS | ATL R: 5 | OFF | @TOR R: 5 | OFF | @BOS R: 5 | MEM R: 1 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Cleveland CAVALIERS | @SAC R: 6 | OFF | @POR R: 4 | OFF | OFF | @UTA R: 4 | OFF | G: 3 H: 0 R: 4 |
| Dallas MAVERICKS | MIN R: 5 | OFF | HOU R: 8 | OFF | OKC R: 4 | OFF | @ORL R: 3 | G: 4 H: 3 R: 7 |
| Denver NUGGETS | OFF | POR R: 9 | @OKC R: 6 | OFF | WSH R: 8 | OFF | OKC R: 7 | G: 4 H: 3 R: 9 |
| Detroit PISTONS | OFF | OFF | OFF | DET R: 5 | OFF | OFF | BOS R: 6 | G: 2 H: 2 R: 2 |
| Golden State WARRIORS | OFF | OFF | MIA R: 7 | OFF | @SA R: 6 | @NO R: 6 | OFF | G: 3 H: 1 R: 5 |
| Houston ROCKETS | OFF | LAC R: 6 | @DAL R: 10 | OFF | @IND R: 3 | @MIN R: 6 | OFF | G: 4 H: 1 R: 8 |
| Indiana PACERS | OFF | @CHA R: 7 | @ORL R: 3 | OFF | HOU R: 7 | OFF | OFF | G: 3 H: 1 R: 5 |
| Los Angeles CLIPPERS | @MEM R: 4 | @HOU R: 10 | OFF | @MIN R: 7 | OFF | WSH R: 10 | OFF | G: 4 H: 1 R: 10 |
| Los Angeles LAKERS | OFF | MIL R: 7 | OFF | MIA R: 7 | OFF | OFF | @TOR R: 8 | G: 3 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Memphis GRIZZLIES | LAC R: 4 | OFF | @SA R: 6 | OFF | SAC R: 8 | @CHI R: 4 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 7 |
| Miami HEAT | @UTA R: 6 | OFF | @GS R: 5 | @LAL R: 7 | OFF | OFF | OFF | G: 3 H: 0 R: 5 |
| Milwaukee BUCKS | OFF | @LAL R: 7 | OFF | @PHX R: 7 | OFF | @POR R: 6 | OFF | G: 3 H: 0 R: 6 |
| Minnesota TIMBERWOLVES | @DAL R: 8 | OFF | OFF | LAC R: 4 | OFF | HOU R: 8 | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 6 |
| New Orleans HORNETS | OFF | @PHI R: 5 | @BOS R: 5 | OFF | OFF | GS R: 3 | OFF | G: 3 H: 1 R: 4 |
| New York KNICKS | OFF | OFF | OFF | @DET R: 4 | OFF | OFF | OFF | G: 1 H: 0 R: 1 |
| Oklahoma City THUNDER | @PHX R: 10 | OFF | DEN R: 10 | OFF | @DAL R: 10 | OFF | @DEN R: 9 | G: 4 H: 1 R: 10 |
| Orlando MAGIC | @WSH R: 4 | OFF | IND R: 1 | OFF | CHA R: 9 | OFF | DAL R: 9 | G: 4 H: 3 R: 8 |
| Philadelphia 76ERS | OFF | NO R: 4 | OFF | OFF | TOR R: 4 | OFF | OFF | G: 2 H: 2 R: 1 |
| Phoenix SUNS | OKC R: 3 | OFF | OFF | MIL R: 4 | OFF | OFF | OFF | G: 2 H: 2 R: 1 |
| Portland TRAIL BLAZERS | OFF | @DEN R: 4 | CLE R: 7 | OFF | OFF | MIL R: 5 | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 5 |
| Sacramento KINGS | CLE R: 7 | OFF | WSH R: 5 | OFF | @MEM R: 1 | @CHA R: 7 | OFF | G: 4 H: 2 R: 7 |
| San Antonio SPURS | OFF | OFF | MEM R: 6 | OFF | GS R: 8 | @ATL R: 8 | OFF | G: 3 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Toronto RAPTORS | OFF | @BKN R: 2 | CHI R: 3 | OFF | @PHI R: 4 | OFF | LAL R: 6 | G: 4 H: 2 R: 6 |
| Utah JAZZ | MIA R: 6 | OFF | OFF | OFF | OFF | CLE R: 8 | OFF | G: 2 H: 2 R: 3 |
| Washington WIZARDS | ORL R: 2 | OFF | @SAC R: 3 | OFF | @DEN R: 1 | @LAC R: 1 | OFF | G: 4 H: 1 R: 4 |
<thead>
</thead><tbody>
</tbody>
<center> Ratings color scale </center> |
---|